(Opinion article)
In our life, we are constantly faced with mass culture. It is an integral part of our existence because we are the bearers of this culture. Around this phenomenon that seems to be usual for us, there are many discussions. What is the mass culture? When did it appear? What influence does the mass culture have on people’s consciousness: positive or negative? And the main question is: why do people need it?
Mass culture is a culture, popular among the general
public in a particular society and is the most commercially successful, with
elements everywhere: in cooking, clothes, consumption, media, in entertainment
(for example, in sports and literature) – in contrast to “elitist culture.”
Mass
culture is the opposite of the elitist and is seen as a contrast to past
phenomena, cultural elements. And what is an elite culture? This is the
“for the elect” culture, which is oriented toward the elite as the
best part of society. It has a more complex structure, difficult to perceive
and puts certain conditions for the consumer, for example, a high level of
education. Mass culture is, on the contrary, considered to be public,
understandable to ordinary people, simplified. Another important aspect is its
commercialization.
The question
arises: is mass culture for humankind a fall into the abyss or a new stage in
development? There are many approaches, attitudes to this issue because the
topic of research is to some extent subjective and relies on experience, world
perception, the definition of culture as a term. For some mass culture is a new
type of culture, for others – degradation, vulgarization, the death of an elite
culture. As it was said by V. Westwood, “Popular culture is a contradiction in
terms. If it`s popular, it is not culture.”
In my opinion,
what is shared by the masses is not always bad. Of course, mass culture has its
own peculiarities. It often uses stamps and stereotypes. Some products do only
to earn more on human feelings and well-known images. The commodity and
entertainment orientation of mass culture can become a powerful means of
influencing people’s minds due to the emotion of satisfaction. Its purpose is
to stimulate consumer consciousness and certain manipulation of it. But on the
other hand, mass culture has many advantages and also fully corresponds to its
time. It is a “child” of democracy so the authors can create the
product they want while having material support. The most important function of
mass culture is that it is mobile and meets the urgent needs of people.
Despite the fact
that mass culture is gaining momentum, elite culture continues to evolve, but
in close interaction with the masses. Now that the processes of globalization
erase borders, it is very difficult to understand the boundaries. That is why
it is erroneously at the present stage of the development of society to divide
these two concepts and to oppose them to each other.
Consequently,
for every person, the concept of culture may be different. This is a subjective
outlook that each of us lives on. The elite and mass culture are equally
important because the meet the needs of different people. But now the last
“wins”. Until there are masses – mass culture will exist. All
attempts to ban or overcome it will be fruitless, because it is a product of
the present, and all we can do is wait until it is replaced by something else.
Залишити відповідь